Examples of Stockholm Syndrome in Disney

toasterlyreasons:

spiritsonic:

onlyleigh:

trademarkednothing:

 Frollo and Quasimodo

Mother Gothel and Rapunzel

Frollo and Mother Gothel convince Quasimodo and Rapunzel that their lives are dependent on them. The two villains claim the outside world is a terrible place even though they know this is not true. They also constantly emotionally abuse their victims by implying their worthlessness and destroying their self-esteems. Quasimodo and Rapunzel sympathize with their captors and even believe their captors are protecting them and treating them with kindness. However, both captors are merely using and manipulating their victims for their own selfish purposes.

NOT:

The Beast and Belle

 Belle does not sympathize with the Beast when she is treated poorly. She becomes angry and leaves the castle, only returning by her own wish so that the Beast (who saves her) does not freeze to death. She does not respond nicely towards the Beast until he treats her with respect. In this situation, Belle has control and is not manipulated into feeling for the Beast, nor does the Beast treat her disrespectfully after the first night. While the Beast does have an underlying motive as to keeping Belle in his castle, he abandons this idea and sets her free to make her happy. If anything, this story is a case of Lima Syndrome where the captor starts to sympathize with the victim.

Check out this post which refocuses the purpose of Beauty and the Beast from merely (and wrongly) being about Stockholm Syndrome to it’s original purpose.

FUCKING FINALLY

I don’t usually reblog stuff like this, but Beauty and the Beast is my favorite movie and I’d like to have this on my page!

this is actually a very good analysis. I take back all the times I’ve called Beauty and the Beast a ‘stockholm syndrome’ romance. 

THANK YOU someone said it!!!

thenamelessdoll:

image
image
image
image
image
image
image

Noticed that some reposts of my old mermaid GIFs are making their rounds again and I finally decided to give in and make a master post of my own (originally they could be found separately or in this video).

PS: And I want to give a big THANK YOU to everybody who are tagging me under all the re-posts. You guys are the best! <3<3<3

CHARACTERS © DISNEY: Pocahontas, Tiana, Cinderella, Jasmine, Aurora, Belle, Mulan, Megara, Nita, Kida, Esmeralda, Giselle, Snow White, Nani, Lilo, Jane, Chicha, Mei, Su, Ting Ting

Program used: Adobe After Effects
Originally made: 2015

Want to know how I made these? 

Check out my new Youtube channel or my mermaid tag. 😉

WARNING: THE INCREDIBLES 2  IS NOT EPILEPSY SAFE.

exigetspersonal:

This is not a joke. I was at a premier showing tonight, and my immediate thought was how disasterously unsafe this movie is for my photosensitive epilepic friends. @markingatlightspeed I’m tagging you with this specifically because this would be extremely dangerous for you to watch.

There are multiple scenes in this movie with full-screen, black-and-white flashing strobe effects. They all happen without warning, and last anywhere between a few seconds to more than two minutes. In a darkened movie theater, this means the likelihood of a seizure could be VERY HIGH if you are sensitive to these effects.

If you have photosensitive epilepsy or another disorder that is triggered by strobe lights, I would highly recommend you DO NOT SEE THE INCREDIBLES 2 IN THEATERS. Wait until the movie’s released on digital/Bluray, and you can watch it in a fully-lit room, with someone with you who will be able to help if the strobe effects do trigger a seizure.

Please stay safe.

ok ok ok ok ok ok can I just have a quick lil moment of your time?

mod2amaryllis:

This shit.

So Hunchback is far and away my favorite movie from Disney’s
Renaissance, and it always makes me so happy that yes, people seem to
appreciate it, people seem to love it, but I’mma go into exactly WHY it’s my
favorite, and WHY I think it’s so crucial, and WHY I think it should be
required viewing for young boys specifically.

We all know that a huge bulk of the media we’ve grown up
with consistently has that one frustrating message:  Being the hero means you’ll get the
girl.
 Many boys let this mentality bleed
into reality.  We have “nice guys,” who
feel that their niceness entitles them to romance, when obviously that
discredits a female’s personal choice.  We
all get this, we all know this, and a lot of us get that it’s a toxic message.

So check out our hero.

He’s an incredibly good person who isn’t conventionally attractive.

Check out our lady.

Super good person, conventionally attractive.

The movie so deliberately builds up Quasi’s hopes.  There’s a whole fucking song about it.

But Esmeralda, who is her own person with her own
motivations and preferences, chooses another man, who is also good and also
attractive.

A lot of people criticize this aspect of the movie, the fact
that Quasi doesn’t get the girl BECAUSE of his appearance.  But my argument?  This is the best damn message a movie could
ever send.

Because when things get dicey, when Esmeralda’s life in in
danger, when Quasi would be putting his own life on the line, he knows that
romance is no longer within the realm of possibility.  He knows he won’t be “getting the girl.”  He knows this, and he allows himself a moment
of bitterness, he risks falling prey to the “nice guy” trope, and he almost
succumbs.

“She already has her knight in shining armor, and it’s not me.”

BUT THEN HE DOES THE RIGHT THING.

He has NO ulterior motive for saving her life.  NO ulterior motive for opposing the man who
raised him.  And he doesn’t know that he’ll
get any reward, he knows he could straight up get killed for his actions, and
yet he still acts.

And there’s no bitterness.
There’s still so, so much love between him and Esmeralda, pure awesome
platonic love, and love between him and Phoebus, and just fucking love all
around, it’s amazing.

I’ve heard so many people express distaste at Quasi not
ending up with Esmerelda.  Like he was
cheated out of some kind of reward.  But
have they watched the ending?

Does that look like a man cheated of his reward?  Does he look like he “lost” to Phoebus?  No dude, that’s a man who has everything he
ever wanted, and that’s also a man who didn’t “get the girl.”

If that’s not an essential message for young boys to hear, I
don’t know what is.

Okay, I ABSOLUTELY agree with this post, but, I don’t mean to be a dampener or anything, but Quasi gets a girl in the sequel movie 😅